Is wearing protection for you?
Tuesday, August 19th, 2008Yes, we live in an unsafe world. It is theoretically likely (though the ODDS may not be high) that you could get injured by a wayward bullet, a falling airplane part or some random weapon by a frantic robber.
How do you stay safe on America’s streets while still looking fashionably good? You can’t walk around in Army gear all day because you never know when you might get an invitation to some hoity-toity event.
Well, there may be a solution for those who want to look stylish while still being able to withstand fire from an Uzi machine gun. Just got to head overseas first to buy what the paranoid super-rich are clamoring for. Oh yeah, and it’s gonna cost you. This is according to a story on UPI, which is reporting that bulletproof designer fashion is now available through Britain’s best-known retailer:
Harrods is now carrying a Colombian entrepreneur’s line of luxury “ballistic daywear” for customers fearing personal attack. Included among those wanting the clothes are King Abdullah II of Jordan, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and actor Steven Segal, The Daily Telegraph reported Saturday.
The customized clothing line includes a polo shirt, a blazer, a sports jacket, a biker jacket and a raincoat with prices ranging between $6,500 and $15,400. It is described as being wearable at parties even while tough enough to withstand fire from an Uzi machine gun.
—–
Designer Miguel Caballero even “tests” the clothes’ durability on his employees — by shooting them! (I found a video but unfortunately for some reason it is not loading properly [no pun intended!] into this story…)
So does bulletproof fashion go overboard or is it always better to be safe than sorry? Would you have a need for such an ensemble in your daily life? In an unrelated fashion story, reported on UPI, the largest teachers union in Britain has criticized a manufacturer of school uniforms for marketing a blazer designed to help students hide iPods:
Chris Keates, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, described Marks & Spencer’s “Blazer for iPod,” which is part of the clothing manufacturer’s 2008 Back to School collection, as “unnecessary and an error of judgment.”
The blazer, which is available in both male and female styles, features an inside pocket for hidden electronic devices and hidden built-in controls compatible with iPods. The jacket also features lapels designed to conceal earphone wires.
“Teachers are already battling against the misuse of such technology in classrooms. Pupils nowadays come to school equipped with mobile phones, MP3 players, and portable games consoles when teachers would like them to just bring a pen,” Keates said. “In its place this technology is useful, entertaining and perfectly legitimate for youngsters but its place is not for personal use in classrooms.”
—–
At least it sounds like those blazers would make it less likely students would lose their iPods…
What kind of gadgets do you wish you could fashionably attach to your outfits? Regarding your cell phone, are you one of those who stick it in your pocket or clip it on your pants? Ladies: Are you one of those who can never retrieve your phone in time because it’s lost somewhere in your purse?
Ever get annoyed by impractical designs? Pretend pockets? Too tiny buttons (to do and undo)? Complicated bows that practically leaves you playing Twister just to tie?
Any ODD fashions (besides those you see on a runway) you’ve seen worn around town? What were your favorite fashions back in the day? Bell-bottoms or Z Cavaricci pants perhaps? Or maybe popped collars for the men and ruffles for the ladies? Anyone remember baby doll dresses and clogs?












