honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Archive for June, 2008

These are my favorite things

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Childhood possessions. Jewelry from old sweethearts. Photos before the days of digital cameras.

Some folks lovingly hold on to such items as they journey into adulthood. But as we accumulate more items over the years, where do you draw the line between becoming a pack rat and cherishing memories?

Do you keep that “perfect attendance” certificate from the fifth grade? How about that trophy from your days in the band?

Or ever imagine something of yours turning up 50 years later that was found by a stranger?

—–

Woman gets back ring she lost in lake in 1954
Associated Press

LUDINGTON, Mich. — A woman who lost her class ring in Lake Michigan in 1954 has it back, thanks to a metal-detector hobbyist.

Robert Savage told the Ludington Daily News for a story Saturday that he found the ring about 12 years ago but only recently began looking for its owner.

He did a bit of detective work by looking at the initials and the year on the ring. He found a Ludington High yearbook for 1955 and found that Jan Pedersen was the only person in the class with the right initials.

Now Jan Zacharda, she says she had forgotten about the ring she lost at Ludington State Park. And she’s even more puzzled that Savage found it in a lake about a dozen miles away.

Zacharda now wears the ring on her index finger, where it fits better.
—–
Ever lose something that miraculously turned up years later? Or ever find something that you barely remember why you kept in the first place?

How do you decide when to toss out possessions from years past? Are there some items that you absolutely have to keep — whether to display, store or to show your great-grandkids?

Parting ways with a classic

Sunday, June 29th, 2008

Parting ways can be hard, even when you’re only downsizing. I had a huge collection of stuffed animals that I eventually donated or gave away over the years. It got too hard to clean (yes, those fuzzy creatures are just a magnet for dust bunnies) and too humbug to properly put “in order.”

Remember those hammocks that you could string across your room? Problem with those were that if some tall person didn’t duck, the whole hammock would swing and all the animals would fall to the ground…

Interestingly, I downsized the bulk of my collection only to receive more cute critters. And nowadays, bigger seems to be the trend as I now have stuffed animals that literally are half the size of me! Since they can’t fit on a shelf, they now sit on chairs around the room. Okay now…

Well this next story is not about donating some stuffed bear, but classic cars — and we’re not just talking about one or two either!

—–

Entrepreneur auctions off 200 classic cars
By JOHN ROGERS
Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — As he prepares to watch his treasured 1940 Howard Hughes Cadillac and hundreds of other meticulously maintained automobiles be driven right out the door, broadcasting pioneer Art Astor is realizing a piece of his heart will be leaving with them.

A Southern California native who grew up with a passion for automobiles, Astor began collecting classic cars 30 years ago when he began buying radio stations and making the kind of money that would allow him to own something like the 1927 Rolls-Royce roadster that once belonged to movie cowboy Tom Mix.

Now 83 and unable to find anyone willing or financially able to take on his collection after he’s gone, Astor has decided to part with about 200 of his approximately 270 cars.

Those he’s selling went on the block yesterday at the Astor Events Center in Anaheim, where much of Astor’s large collection of antique radios and telephones also began being sold Friday. The sale of all items concludes today and is expected to raise $20 million to $25 million.

cars.jpg
From Cadillacs to Rolls-Royces, 200 of radio veteran Art Astor’s cars are going up for auction. (AP Photo/RM Auctions)

It is parting with the cars, however, that is breaking the heart of Astor, who owns radio station KSPA, which broadcasts in Southern California’s inland region, and stations KFSD and KCEO in the San Diego area.

“I don’t have any car that I ever bought that I didn’t like,” the normally effusive entrepreneur says quietly during a recent phone interview from his museum. He’s just gotten back, he says, from taking his 1955 Cadillac Coup de Ville out for a spin.

“When you part with an automobile that I purchased myself and test drove it and looked at it and fell in love with it,” he adds with a sigh. “It almost borders on trauma.”

That’s why he won’t part with the 1947 Ford Woody that once belonged to actor Steve McQueen. He tried and failed to acquire it when McQueen sold his own car collection shortly before his death in 1980 and had to wait 15 years for it to come back on the auction block.

“That’s one of my favorites,” he says, even if it’s not the collection’s priciest. But then Astor, who says he moved on from hosting a local TV show early in his career to running radio stations because it was the guys who did that who seemed to drive the really nice cars, didn’t buy any of his vehicles with strictly dollar signs in mind.

“I prefer to have maybe a 1950 Oldsmobile holiday coup that’s worth maybe $50,000 instead of a Deusenberg worth a million-and-a-half,” he says. “I don’t like to drive a Deusenberg. I’d rather drive an Oldsmobile.”

Or the 1939 Plymouth with only 9,000 miles on it. It’s probably worth no more than $25,000.

“But it gives me joy because it’s an example of a prewar automobile,” Astor says. “It’s still got the ‘Elect Roosevelt’ sticker on it.”

Unlike most cars found in automotive museums, Astor could take that Plymouth or one of his Rolls-Royces or Packards or Jaguars or Buick Roadmasters out on the road right now. He keeps every car in his Astor Automotive Museum polished and ready to drive.

cars2.jpg
A 1948 Packard Custom Convertible Coupe that is part of the Astor Collection. (AP Photo/RM Auctions)

“It’s the only museum in the world that I’m aware of that everything here works — including its curator,” Astor says, laughing heartily.

And that’s part of the reason he’s cleaning it out. Maintaining a staff of a half-dozen or more people to keep his cars, radios and phones working costs him a fortune, he says, adding: “I’m not wealthy enough or have the deep pockets to throw a couple million dollars away every year.”

So when the auction is complete there will still be an Astor Events Center, albeit with a scaled-down museum.
—–

What memories do you have of your first or favorite car?

Can you see yourself holding onto a prized car for a long time just to show to your kids or grandkids? I know some guys who kept their “hot little sports car” despite it missing a door handle or other functional feature (that most girls gravitate toward) when they got a new set of wheels.

Hello, my name is F***

Saturday, June 28th, 2008

The great thing about living in America is that you have the freedom to do many things. We have so many rights compared to those in developing countries or citizens ruled by a hard-line government.

If you want to sue someone, get a divorce or change your name, it’s relatively easy.

But what do you think about this man’s attempt to change his name? And yes, this is a different story from the one I shared earlier about the guy who changed his name to In God We Trust.

—–

N.M. court says no to ‘F— Censorship!’
By DEBORAH BAKER
Associated Press

SANTA FE, N.M. — A New Mexico appeals court on Friday ruled against a Los Alamos man who wanted to change his name to a phrase containing a popular four-letter obscenity.

The man appealed after a state district judge in Bernalillo County refused his request to change his name to “F— Censorship!”

Judge Nan Nash ruled that the proposed name change was “obscene, offensive and would not comport with common decency.”

The man — whose current legal name is Variable — argued on appeal that it was improper government censorship to deny him the name change.

“We do not believe that the district court’s action infringes on petitioner’s right to free speech,” a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals said in its ruling.

The man has the right to call himself whatever he wants, unless there’s fraud or misrepresentation involved, the judges said.

But once he seeks court approval for a name change, the court has the authority to turn him down on several grounds, including if the name is offensive to common decency and good taste, the judges ruled.

That law was clarified in a 2004 case in the same court that apparently involved the same petitioner. In that case, an Albuquerque man whose name was Snaphappy Fishsuit Mokiligon got the go-ahead from the appeals court to change his name to Variable.
—–

So whose side are you on? Even if this guy is a nut case and wasting the time of our busy judges, should he have the right to pick his own name? What about businesses, specifically hostess bars and such, that pick out clever names to lure in clients?

On an unrelated note, here’s an update on that winning bid for a lunch with billionaire Warren Buffett. The auction ended last night with a bid of $2,110,100 from a Chinese investment fund manager. It was the most expensive charity auction ever held on eBay.

Timing off for stripper-caddy girls

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

Strippers as caddies? That reminds me of something I saw on the Travel channel for a feature on Vegas. Apparently there is one course that will give golfers a little incentive for playing a better game. I think the scantily clad women do “tricks” for birdies and such.

But timing issues during a back-to-back tournament in Colorado had some strippers crossing paths with children… What do you tell your kid when a woman is seen exiting a limo in her underwear?

—–

Kid golfers run into strippers at golf course
Associated Press

BROOMFIELD, Colo. — A close encounter between flirtatious strippers and children playing in a golf tournament was the result of “mistiming,” golf course officials said Tuesday as they apologized to parents.

The scantily clad women spilled out of a limousine as the youngsters were finishing their game as part of the Gold Crown Junior Golf Association tournament Monday. Tournament officials said they were not warned the strippers would be arriving before the end of the game for children, who ranged in age from 7 to 12.

The women were part of Shotgun Willie’s Charity Golf Tournament to benefit breast cancer. The strippers were to serve as caddies to patrons of the strip club. A club manager said there were 144 golfers and 70 caddies.

A woman told KUSA-TV the event drew curious questions from her children, who asked her why the men joining the strippers had water guns and why the women wore only their underwear. KUSA said the woman declined to be identified.

Eagle Trace Golf Course manager Evelyn Koch says the women were forbidden from going topless and that they were just flirting with the men.

“I cannot tell you the girls didn’t flash out there but it wasn’t a free-for-all,” Koch said. She said the Shotgun Willie’’ crowd and the young golfers had to share the same clubhouse while the children had lunch because their tournament started later than expected.

Still, she said the Broomfield golf course was sorry children were present when the strippers arrived.

Golf course instructor Dustin Moser said some of the strippers “got a little out of control” but that it happened after the children had left.

Information from: KUSA-TV, www.9news.com
See a news video of this story. It’s a family-friendly paper so I can assure you that you won’t see any strippers…

—–

What are your thoughts on having a hired stripper be your personal cheerleader?

Any interesting golf tales you can share — perhaps you’ve seen some indiscretions on the course in the past?

What about passing on some etiquette tips? What are your pet peeves on the golf course? I know I should do a better job raking the sand after my ball lands in the bunker!

My butt for the world to see

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

Ever imagine how your claim to fame could be? In this digital age, it probably will come on YouTube. And I’m not talking about infamous sex tapes that has churned out some self-made celebrities.

Even if you have no intentions of becoming a household name on the Internet, make sure your significant other is also in the loop.

Take the story of 25-year-old Lauren Bernat, who if you haven’t heard, can be seen gyrating in a T-shirt and striped underwear to Nintendo’s Wii Fit video game. The YouTube clip titled “Why every guy should buy their girlfriend Wii Fit” was surreptitiously filmed by her boyfriend while she did hula-hoop motions on the exercise device in her apartment.

The minute-long video was posted on Memorial Day weekend and has since been viewed more than 4 million times.

The boyfriend, who is director of interactive media for Miami-based Tinsley Advertising, says he was “testing a couple ideas” that day he sat on a couch behind Bernat and made her famous.

Despite Bernat’s initial fury, she is now enjoying her instant fame. “There’s been a radio station interview. I’ve got MTV calling me,” she says. “The U.K. wants me to do an exclusive photo shoot. People are asking me, ‘Do you work for Nintendo?’ This thing has taken off; it’s insane!”

The video has drawn 3,500-plus comments on YouTube, including this one: “I get a huge flashback to Cameron Diaz doin’ her booty shake in Charlie’s Angels. … Props to your girl.” (And just a warning that some of the comments are not exactly PG.)

[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/v31qxrXsxv0" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

—-

Personally, I think the video is boring. Yet I still wouldn’t want to be the one unknowingly starring in it. And I wouldn’t be happy with the person who uploaded the video either. By the way, Bernat and her boyfriend are still together.

Is today’s technology coming back to hurt us as people find ways to take advantage of the Internet? When cameras started becoming popular on cell phones, signs went up at the gym prohibiting the use of them in the locker rooms. Though the thought of someone snapping a picture while you’re in a bathroom stall never even crossed my mind…

Have you been a victim of technology? Would you ever secretly upload a video of your friends or partner?

What are your thoughts on using YouTube for your 15 minutes of fame?